Model drags Wema Bank to court, demands N75m for using her photograph

Image result for Nneoma Anosike
Nigerian Model, Miss Nneoma Anosike has dragged Wema Bank plc before a Federal High Court in Lagos, over alleged infringement on intellectual property.

The 21 year old plaintiff who is a 2014 brand Ambassador of Pepsi Cola Nigeria, sued through her father, Mr Frank Anosike, as lawful Attorney, claiming the sum of N75 million against Wema, as general damages for passing off her services.The plaintiff who is based in America is claiming the sum of N20 million as damages for breach of her privacy, by advertising her photograph without her consent and special damages of N2million as cost of action, plus 21 percent interest on sum.
Besides, she is seeking a declaration that she is entitled to her privacy and those of her correspondences, under section 37 of the 1999 constitution. Anosike also seeks a public apology from the defendant, to be advertised in National dailies circulating in the U.S and Nigeria.
At the resumed hearing of the case, the sole witness for the plaintiff, Mr Frank Anosike, continued his examination in chief.
Led in evidence by his lawyer, Mr Gideon Okebu, Anosike told the court that his daughter entered into a three years management contract with an international firm, named Ford Model Incorporated New York, in 2014.
He said that the plaintiff was granted an American Visa through the instrumentality of Ford, following which she travelled from Nigeria to the United States, to continue her career solely under Ford.
According to the witness, on April 11, 2016, his daughter was requisitioned to attend a meeting with the board of Ford where she was presented with photographic advert of her picture from Instagram, which was photo-edited by Wema bank and further advertised on their website.

He said that his daughter’s picture was used for the advert with the bank’s corporate logo beside her face and the words, “Be yourself, Everyone else is taken”
According to him, this projection of his daughter by the bank was with the aim of projecting their value and good will using the fame and popularity of the plaintiff.
He said that this act of the defendant, constituted a breach of his daughter’s agreement with Ford Model, as it has caused a retraction of contract extension by the firm.
Justice Ibrahim Buba has adjourned until Nov. 20 for cross examination of the witness.


  1. Replies
    1. Oh,remind me again,I never knew this blog was like a cult where you all know yourselves and new members are not allowed to comment 😎

      You really think highly of yourself coming at me to spit trash,to burst your bubble,I've been here since the days of honeypointer OG WRITE yesuan and others,so I'm not a newbie !

      You are only doing Kemi a disservice if you keep on throwing tantrums on new commenters,if the giveaway will make you feel good,so be it,leave me out of your mess!

      I'm OUT✌️

    2. #Para Mode
      Take it easy Unbreakable me. Ko le to yi na.

    3. What's going on here? Easy guys..

    4. You captured the exact thing on my mind.

  2. Lol.How much is their profit that she will sue them with such amount of money.

  3. That's too unprofessional from wema bank. An organization like wema bank should know better na.

  4. What they did was wrong,why use her picture without her consent?

  5. Wema bank should know better na.


Kemi Filani Blog (KFB) keeps it real, makes it fun!

We appreciate your comment(s).

If you need to contact Kemi Filani
News/Tip Off/Advert

*Comments on this blog are NOT posted by Kemi Filani.
*Readers are SOLELY responsible for the comments they post
*Thank you.

Designed by Jide Ogunsanya.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...